Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
3536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 8100 +10650%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2017
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Vega 10
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy