Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +1728%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2016
NVS
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
GM206
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy