Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
3536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +10220%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
NVS
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
56
48
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
GA100
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy