Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
3792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +17720%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2021
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
3840
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Navi 21
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy