Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
5072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +21920%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2021
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
80
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Navi 21
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy