Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +1148%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2017
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Lexa
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy