Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290 +4749%
4.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2013
NVS
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Hawaii
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy