Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 132W)
AMD Radeon RX 6600 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2491MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6600 +8828%
8.928 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2021
NVS
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1626 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2491 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.4 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.86 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.928 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
558.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
132W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Navi 23
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 23 XL (215-130000016)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy