Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 263W)
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
3792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7800 XT +37220%
37.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2023
NVS
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
875 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
3840
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
583.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
74.65 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.32 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1166 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
263W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 3x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Navi 32
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 32 XT (215-180000006)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy