Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 315 vs ATI FireGL V7700

NVIDIA NVS 315 vs ATI FireGL V7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
ATI FireGL V7700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.06GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
FireGL V7700 +397%
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
NVS
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
48
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
RV670
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
RV670 GL
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy