Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA NVS 315 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +8092%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2015
NVS
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
48
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Fiji
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy