Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 315 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

NVIDIA NVS 315 vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (19W vs 44W)
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.24GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
NVS
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
RV535
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²

Board Design

19W
TDP
44W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy