Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

NVIDIA NVS 4200M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 4200M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 4200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock975MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 4200M
0.156 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +1180%
1.997 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Nov 2014
NVS Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
975 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.620 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
6.480 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
155.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
12.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
Pitcairn
N12P-NS1-S-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy