Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs Intel Arc A770

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs Intel Arc A770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Arc A770 +6324%
19.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Oct 2022
NVS
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
DG2-512
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy