Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270 +292%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Nov 2008
NVS
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
800
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
RV770
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy