Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +831%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Jun 2020
NVS
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU106
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy