Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM +35%
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Dec 2009
NVS
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1792MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
192
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
-
-
-
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy