Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 200W)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO +25%
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Dec 2007
NVS
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
R600
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy