Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY +2242%
7.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Jul 2015
NVS
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Fiji
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy