Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 345W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1677MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling +4390%
13.74 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Aug 2017
NVS
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1406 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1677 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.3 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
429.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.48 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.74 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
858.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
345W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Vega 10
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XTX
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy