NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM
+2330%
5.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2016
NVS Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
Ellesmere
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
