NVIDIA NVS 5200M vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
NVS 5200M
0.24 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
+1350%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2014
NVS Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1362 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
174.3GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.482 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
20.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
217.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF117
GPU Name
Amethyst
N13M-NS1
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
5 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
