Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 5400M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 5400M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 5400M
0.253 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +871%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2020
NVS Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
96
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
10.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
253.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
21.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
TU117
N13P-NS1
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy