Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 5400M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 5400M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock975MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 5400M
0.253 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +689%
1.997 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2014
NVS Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
975 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
10.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
253.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
21.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
Pitcairn
N13P-NS1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy