Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

NVIDIA NVS 5400M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 5400M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 5400M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 5400M
0.253 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +5034%
12.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1635 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
24
96
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
10.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
253.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
21.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
AD107
N13P-NS1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy