Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 810 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

NVIDIA NVS 810 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 810 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Lower TDP (68W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 125% (2320MHz vs 1033MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 810
1.058 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +1584%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jun 2021
NVS
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

902 MHz
Base Clock
2075 MHz
1033 MHz
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
3840
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.53 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
33.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
1058 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
33.06 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

68W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Navi 21
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy