Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 5GB VRAM P102 100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 116% (1683MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 100 +1697%
10.77 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1582 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1376 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
440.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
384
200
TMUs
24
80
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

134.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
336.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
168.3 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
336.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Oland
GP102-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy