Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA P102 100 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 5GB VRAM P102 100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (1683MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 100 +1031%
10.77 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Dec 2013
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1582 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1376 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
440.3GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
512
200
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

134.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
336.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
168.3 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
336.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GP102-100-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy