Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD FirePro D300

NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 101 +391%
10.69 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Jan 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
1280
200
TMUs
80
80
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy