Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2400 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 101 +969%
10.69 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Jun 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
800
200
TMUs
40
80
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
RV770
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy