Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

NVIDIA P102 101 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM P102 101 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1670MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P102 101 +756%
10.69 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Jun 2017
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1670 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

10GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
25
SM Count
-
3200
Shading Units
512
200
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
0 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
334.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
167.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
10.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
334.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Lexa
GP102-101-A1
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy