Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P104 100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA P104 100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P104 100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P104 100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1733MHz vs 1590MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (80W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P104 100 +133%
6.655 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2017
Release Date
Jul 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1607 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.3GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
15
SM Count
14
1920
Shading Units
896
120
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
208.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
104.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
6.655 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
208.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
TU116
GP104-100-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy