Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P104 101 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

NVIDIA P104 101 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P104 101 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P104 101 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1683MHz vs 1590MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (90W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P104 101 +202%
8.617 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Jun 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.3GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
896
160
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

107.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
269.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
134.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
8.617 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
269.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
TU106
GP104-101-A1
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy