Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P104 101 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA P104 101 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P104 101 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P104 101 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (1683MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.3GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P104 101 +354%
8.617 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Feb 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.3GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1024
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

107.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
269.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
134.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.617 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
269.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GP104-101-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy