Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P104 101 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

NVIDIA P104 101 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM P104 101 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P104 101 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (1683MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 256.3GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P104 101 +110%
8.617 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2018
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
950 MHz
1683 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
256.3GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
2560
Shading Units
2048
160
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

107.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
269.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
134.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.617 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
269.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
Tahiti
GP104-101-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

125W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy