Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106 090 vs ATI FirePro V3750

NVIDIA P106 090 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM P106 090 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106 090 +568%
2.352 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2017
Release Date
Sep 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1354 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

73.49 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
73.49 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
36.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.352 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
73.49 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
48W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
RV730
GP106-090-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy