Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106 100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

NVIDIA P106 100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM P106 100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106 100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1709MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Lower TDP (90W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106 100 +53%
4.375 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jun 2020
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1709 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
14
1280
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

82.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
136.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
68.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
4.375 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
136.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
90W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
TU106
GP106-100-A1
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy