Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA P106 100 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA P106 100 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM P106 100 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P106 100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 80% (1709MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (120W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
P106 100 +28%
4.375 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Nov 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1709 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2002 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.2GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

82.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
136.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
68.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.375 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
136.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
375W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
Tahiti
GP106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy