Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +32150%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Tesla
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
64bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
40
224
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

165W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy