Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
3472 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +2742%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2009
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
14
3584
Shading Units
112
224
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

165W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G92B
-
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy