Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1440MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +389%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1033 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
960
224
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
24
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
24 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GK106
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy