NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1440MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 232
+93%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5.345 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
875 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
384bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
2880
224
TMUs
240
96
ROPs
48
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
24 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.175
8.0
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
