NVIDIA PG506 232 vs AMD FireStream 9370
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
PG506 232
+290%
10.32 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2010
Tesla
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1600
224
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0
