Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FirePro W4000

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +714%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2012
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy