Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FirePro W7000

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 242 +324%
10.32 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
3072bit
Memory Bus
256bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
3584
Shading Units
1280
224
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
24 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

165W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy