NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

VS

NVIDIA PG506 242 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 242 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages

Released 10 months late

More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

2688 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1590MHz vs 1440MHz)

Lower TDP (90W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

PG506 242 +262%

10.32 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

2.849 TFLOPS

PG506 242

VS

GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

Graphics Card

Apr 2021

Release Date

Jun 2020

Tesla

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz

Base Clock

1410 MHz

1440 MHz

Boost Clock

1590 MHz

1215 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

24GB

Memory Size

4GB

HBM2

Memory Type

GDDR6

3072bit

Memory Bus

128bit

933.1GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

56

SM Count

14

-

Compute Units

-

3584

Shading Units

896

224

TMUs

56

96

ROPs

32

224

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

192 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

24 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

50.88 GPixel/s

322.6 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

89.04 GTexel/s

10.32 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

5.699 TFLOPS

10.32 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.849 TFLOPS

5.161 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

89.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100

GPU Name

TU106

-

GPU Variant

TU106-125-KAB-A1

Ampere

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

7 nm

Process Size

12 nm

54.2 billion

Transistors

10.8 billion

826 mm²

Die Size

445 mm²

Board Design

165W

TDP

90W

450 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

No outputs

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

8-pin EPS

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

N/A

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

N/A

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

8.0

CUDA

7.5

N/A

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD Radeon R7 250

2

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

3

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs ATI Radeon X1950 PRO DUAL

4

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

5

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

6

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs ATI Radeon HD 4550

7

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra

8

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs ATI Radeon HD 3830

9

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs Intel Xe DG1 SDV

10

NVIDIA PG506 242 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6200 X2 PCI

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance