NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 1000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 1000M
0.269 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+1220%
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
GK110B
N12P-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
