NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 1000M and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 1000M
0.269 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+1005%
2.974 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
9
96
Shading Units
1152
16
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
GP106
N12P-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
