Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 1000M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
13216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 1000M
0.269 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +16725%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
208
96
Shading Units
13312
16
TMUs
832
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N12P-Q1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

45W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy