Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 8GB VRAM GRID M6 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
GRID M6 8Q +362%
2.218 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.21 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.31 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.218 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
69.31 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GM204
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

62W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy